The Communist Takeover of the USA

Nikita Khrushchev and Fidel Castro

Nikita Khrushchev and Fidel Castro

According to Ezra Taft Benson, the Secretary of Agriculture of the Eisenhower administration, Nikita Khrushchev said, “You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept Communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of Socialism util you will finally wake up and find that you already have Communism. We won’t have to fight you, we will so weaken your economy until you fall like overripe fruit into our hands.”

It is interesting to note that God also spoke of “overripe fruit.” In Hosea 10:1, God speaks of an empty vine in reference to the people who God had blessed far beyond what they could consume, a fattened populace taking money from large crops but who do not build a house for God and do not worship him. In Hosea 10:13, God goes on to say, “Ye have plowed wickedness, ye have reaped iniquity; ye have eaten the fruit of lies: because thou didst trust in thy way, in the multitude of thy mighty men.” Sadly, overripe Americans have consumed the fruit of lies by believing the truth of mighty Communists whose will is to destroy America.

As predicted by Khrushchev, America has slowly fallen under Communist rule and succumbed to the tenants of Leninist/Marxist social justice. In Karl Marx’s view, co-author of the Communist Manifesto, God, spirit and other abstractions must be removed and replaced with a more earthly, tangible, material world, a world created in its own image and not God’s. Lenin founded the Russian Marxist party between 1900 and 1903, called the Bolsheviki, who later renamed themselves “Communists” after Marx’s term in the Communist Manifest. The Leninist doctrine was “dialectical materialism” based on Russian revolutionary N.G. Chernyshevskii, whose novel, “What is to be Done?” became a classic of the Russian revolutionary movement. Russian Chernyshevsky rejected such concepts as honor, conscience, duty and self-sacrifice. He called for freedom in personal relations, dedication to society, women’s emancipation and socialism for revolution and believed that human behavior is motivated by self-interest. His “Dialectical materialism” is the theoretical foundation of Marxism.

The first feature of Dialectic thought is change, and then that change results in progress. But, progress to a Communist is uniquely different; it is a resolute forward advance followed by an abrupt turn and retreat. Having retreated a distance there is another turn and advance and it is through these series of forward-backward steps the Communist goal is approached. Lenin wrote the textbook, One Step Forward, Two Steps Back and Chinese Communist schoolchildren are taught to do the dialectical march taking three steps forward and two steps back. If we naively judge where the communists are going by the direction in which they are moving, we will be deceived.

A good example of dialectic deception is demonstrated in Communist led Russia today; divorce is discouraged and puritanic morals are encouraged! They are strengthening the family in every way even though their ultimate goal is to abolish the family! But, they cannot abolish the family until they have changed human nature, and they cannot change human nature until they control the environment that generates human nature, and they cannot totally control the environment until they have conquered the world and destroyed the present environment, and they cannot conquer the world unless they develop a more courageous, more patriotic, more nationalistic people than their enemy!

The same Russian Dialectic theory applies to religion. The ultimate goal of Communism is the abolition of all religion. Lenin says, “Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism,” however, in some states under Communist rule, religion is being patronized and encouraged because religion constitutes a force that moves to action a certain segment of the community, and Communism utilizes those existing forces! Religion, therefore, must be utilized to advance the final goal of Communism… which is world conquest!

As Khrushchev said to the French Socialists: “Some of our comrades are atheists in the Party and believers at home.” One Communist, then, may be instructed to join the Catholic Church. He is told to be baptized, to believe everything he has to believe, to be the very finest Catholic imaginable and to secure influence in Catholic organizations. He will then have opportunity to influence Catholic organizations in a program which may appear to be completely unrelated to communism but which may be important to their dialectical advance. Similarly, Communists are told to join various Protestant churches. Again they are to be fervently Protestant, orthodox to the core, ardent in spirit, and industrious in the program of that church. At the appropriate time, they too will be able to influence various church members and organizations for the Communist cause. Yes, many churches have failed us and radical churches have infiltrated America!

The final feature of the Communist dialectic is the role of conflict in the process of change. According to the dialectic, the driving force in any situation is the conflict of two opposing forces. Dividing people into hostile classes glorifies the struggle between them in the hope that the result will be good for the Communist party. Obama’s racist agenda and upcoming Jade Helm 15 exercises, an acronym for “Joint Assistant For Development and Execution” “Homeland Eradication of Local Militants”in 2015, just may be the rehearsal that eventually ushers in a “struggle” and in time the final Communist takeover of America. Remember Obama’s whisper into Russian President Medvedev’s ear…that he would be more flexible after his election? Bet Raul Castro is still chuckling under his breath.

Obama is a sleeper agent for world Communism and as Louis Farrahkan stated, Obama “was selected before he was elected.” The following telling video, is from an interview with Tom Fife, a physicist and U.S. government contractor who claims that in 1992 while visiting Moscow, a woman with undying allegiance to Soviet Communism (the Soviet Union had recently collapsed on December 31, 1991) told him that a black man named Barack, born of a white American woman and an African male, was being groomed by Communists to be, and would be elected, President of the United States.

You may start the video at the 5:00 minute mark to eliminate advertisements and Tom Fife’s interview ends at the 43:00 minute mark. The rest of the video describes a chance meeting with revolutionary Communist Bill Ayers who claims Michelle Obama asked him to write “Dreams of My Father” the autobiographical book Obama is said to have written.

In Matthew 16:1-3, Jesus scolded those who could not discern the times. Will we ignore the signs?

A Rainbow of Justice and Judgement?

Screen Shot 2015-04-12 at 4.03.34 PM

Wearing the right designer labels is important to socialist elites whose clothing is adorned with designer tags which act like mini billboards advertising their wealth and stance in the financial hierarchy, so it is no wonder that “tagging” entire groups of people is also important to them, a fabricated caste “labeling” system meant to either demean and demoralize, or encourage and embolden. One good example of a human tag meant to demean is the Anti-gay label given to Christians whose beliefs are based on scripture and high moral values. Although against the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender lifestyle, the Christian position toward the gay agenda is not Anti-gay but is instead Pro-straight!

Throughout our lives, human beings must make critical personal choices that will either lead to a life of eternity with God or a life spent in eternal hell with Satan. As Christians, we are not “anti” any group of people for we are taught to spread the gospel and help save as many lost souls as possible, but evangelizing does not include compromising on God’s word. Christians, or disciples of Christ, must never coddle lost souls by giving them a sense of false hope of salvation by surrendering or rewriting Christian moral values in order to normalize ungodly convictions.

God is a perceived threat by many and when God is ignored a person can live lustfully without limitations or boundaries, allowing for “degrading passions” like homosexuality and lesbianism. When caught exchanging truth for lies, “God gave them over to shameful lusts.” “..and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.” Romans (1:26-27) That penalty is disease. Years ago, queerness was coupled with the fear of disease and death. Today, there is still no known cure for AIDS or HIV that can reliably eliminate the virus from a person’s body or reverse damage to the immune system. Also, cases of syphilis in the United States are on the rise and have doubled since 2005! According to the CDC, syphilis is a potentially debilitating disease that can be transmitted through sexual activity and men make up ninety-one percent of all US cases, a disease that primarily affects the homosexual community! So why does our government promote an unhealthy homosexual lifestyle? The answer is simple. When God is shoved aside to make way for earthly delights, human life becomes devalued and unimportant.

Under Obama’s sinful leadership, morality has been auctioned off to a sub-culture of worker-bee radicals who allow Marxists maggots to flourish in the rotted grounds of Capitol Hill. At the White House Easter Prayer breakfast, where tax evader, racist Al Sharpton was invited, but not the leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation’s largest Protestant denomination, Obama claimed he is a Christian, and to “love thy neighbor as thyself,” then went off-script to say Christians are “”less than loving.” Does Obama’s all encompassing love mean Christians should also love his penchant for the infanticide of children, mistreatment of the American military and it’s Veterans, and his lack of passion for the persecution of infidels?

On April 28th, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on states wishing to uphold their bans on same sex marriage. Conservative Republicans have said that justices should not impose “a federally mandated redefinition of the ancient institution of marriage nationwide and the court should let voters and their elected legislatures decide what to do about marriage. The Christian position on this should be very clear. God made the male gender uniquely different from the female gender both physically and emotionally. The original intent was for them to procreate and become “one flesh” through sex. (Genesis 2:24) Parenting is  meant to be between a man and a woman. In Jepthah’s Daughters, author Robert Lopez details countless testimonials from same sex couples around the world. “With each day, in all the small gestures and emotional moments, the child puts together a picture of herself in the world and eventually realizes that the same-sex parents have created a world that is . . . what can we call it? Let’s use the language of theater critics: Contrived. Forced. Implausible. Synthetic.” In other words, children are deprived of the normal rhythm of life, God’s perfect symphony. Another gay activist, Doug Mainwaring said, “Same sex marriage will not redefine marriage-it will un-define it, and unravel it, and in so doing will un-define children.”

Lopez also points out that gay marriage is very attractive to corporate America and the industry that supports it.The LGBT’s campaign to radically alter our perception of the sinful nature of homosexuality and legitimize gay marriage has been greedily advanced through music, pornography, movies, television and Public schools via Common Core, while our innocent youth are being violated on a daily basis by gays who openly “parade their sin like Sodom.” (Isaiah 3:9) America’s children are once again pawns caught in the crosshairs of political debate, the sacrificial lambs in a nation gone wild.

On Thursday, April 8th after landing in Jamaica, Obama toured the Bob Marley Museum while one of Marley’s hits, “One Love” played in the background. The late iconic reggae king is known as one of Obama’s favorite artists. Upon leaving the island, a White House photographer caught a shot of Obama seemingly saluting a rainbow.

Did the White House photographer believe the photo to be symbolic of Obama’s gay rainbow pride? Interestingly, the photo can take on an entirely different meaning if interpreted through the eyes of a believer.The rainbow Obama seems to be touching represents Christ himself; Romans 2: 20-21, “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.” There are no excuses according to God for those who do not believe in him.The Bible clearly states there will be a future, global judgment, but next time by fire, not water (2 Peter 3:10). Some commentators even suggest that the watery colors of the rainbow (the blue end of the spectrum) remind us of the destruction by water in Noah’s day, and the fiery colors (the red end of the spectrum) of the coming destruction by fire. In the book of Revelation, a rainbow surrounds the throne. (Rev 4:1,3) God’s rainbows will someday symbolize retributive justice, judgement and God’s great final conflict with the forces of evil and his triumphant victory.

Could it be that Bob Marley was prophetic when he sang: “Is there a place for the hopeless sinner, who has hurt all mankind just to save his own? For now, Marley’s words are just background music for Obama’s immoral leadership, but at some point, the loud trumpets of God will prevail.